UN investigator: Israeli settlement is ‘war crime’


A UN human rights investigator announced July 9 that Israeli settlement of the West Bank and East Jerusalem meets the definition of a war crime. Special rapporteur on the Palestinian Territories, Michael Lynk, addressed a Geneva meeting of the Human Rights Council, in which he gave a report on whether the settlements violate the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Three elements must be satisfied to meet the definition of the war crime of transferring a civilian population into an occupied territory. The material elements are transfer of the population into the territory, and that the transfer took place arising from an international armed conflict. This element was met when Israel captured East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza in 1967 as part of an international armed conflict.

The third element is “mental,” and requires that the perpetrator was “aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.” The report noted that the Israeli government has a long history of supporting the growth of the settlements and that the government “has been fully aware of the clear direction from the international community” that its policy is in direct violation of international law.

Lynk concluded that Israeli behavior meets the definition of a war crime and therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the ICC. He accused Israel of not being “serious about peace” because of its ongoing defiance of the Rome Statute.

Lynk also said that the international community “cannot be serious about its own laws” if it does not hold violators accountable. He included a list of recommended actions for the international community to take, including a review of trade, cultural, and investment agreements with Israel, and a ban on arms sales to Israel. His recommendations also included holding accountable Israeli political, military, and administrative officials responsible for the violations of international law.

Israel, which does not recognize the special rapporteur’s mandate nor cooperate with his office in any way, was not present at the meeting.

From Jurist, July 11. Used with permission.

Note: An ICC investigation into possible Israeli war crimes was formally opened earlier this year—over the protests of Israel, which refuses to recognize the Court’s authority.

Photo: delayed gratification via New Jewish Resistance

  1. Israeli high court proposes ‘compromise’ on Sheikh Jarrah

    Israel’s top court has proposed a plan to prevent the eviction of dozens of Palestinians in the East Jerusalem district of Sheikh Jarrah. The Supreme Court was expected to issue a ruling to end the long legal battle, but instead urged both sides to accept a compromise. Under the proposed deal, the four Palestinian families could stay in their homes if they formally recognize that the land is owned by a Jewish settlement company. The sides have been given a week to respond. (BBC News, AP)

  2. Israel moves ahead with West Bank settlements plan

    Israel’s Civil Administration on the West Bank on Oct. 27 approved plans to build some 3,000 homes for Jewish settlers in the occupied territory, defying a harsh rebuke from the Biden administration, which expressed “deep concern.”

    Bassam al-Salhe, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization said the decision showed that Israel’s new government, led by far-right politician Naftali Bennett, is “no less extreme” than the administration of the veteran leader he replaced, Benjamin Netanyahu.

    The Civil Administration has given preliminary approval for 1,344 new housing units and a final go-ahead for construction of 1,800 homes.

    It will be up to Defense Minister Benny Gantz to give final approval for the construction permits to be issued. (Haaretz)