UK Minister for Security Tom Tugendhat updated Parliament June 6 about Chinese “overseas police service stations” operating within the United Kingdom. Tugendhat told lawmakers that the UK has ordered China to close any remaining “police stations” on UK soil, calling the stations’ existence “unacceptable.” Tugendhat said that British authorities received reports from non-governmental organization Safeguard Defenders of these stations in Croydon, Hendon and Glasgow, with allegations of another in Belfast.
The United States and Ireland both claim to have recently uncovered similar stations in their countries. Like the UK, they said the stations were used to monitor and harass Chinese diaspora communities. Tugenhadt noted that the stations were even known “to coerce people to return to China outside of legitimate channels.” Tugendhat said that Chinese citizens living in the UK “had sought safety and freedom” away from the Chinese Communist Party.
Tugendhat added: “Let me be clear, any attempt by any foreign power to intimidate, harass or harm individuals or communities in the UK will not be tolerated. This is an insidious threat to our democracy and fundamental human rights.”
In response to the controversy, China has maintained that it “adheres to the principle of non-interference in other countries’ internal affairs, strictly observes international laws and respects the judicial sovereignty of all countries…. It is important that some from the UK side respect the facts rather than spread false accusations.”
While before Parliament, Tugendhat also reiterated his plea that both houses of the body pass the pending National Security Bill, which toughens penalties for crimes undertaken on behalf of a foreign state. Those convicted of such acts could face up to 14 years in prison.
From Jurist, June 6. Used with permission.
See our last report on accusations of Chinese extraterritoriality.
Photo of Glasgow location, within restaurant storefront: Google via The Ferret
UK-Chinese dual nationals convicted of spying on Hong Kong dissidents
A retired Hong Kong policeman and a former UK Border Force official were convicted by a London jury of “shadow policing” on British soil on behalf of China. (HKFP)
China ‘snubs’ judicial review over London mega-embassy
The Chinese government has come under criticism after reportedly failing to engage with a forthcoming judicial review concerning its controversial new embassy development at Royal Mint Court in central London, raising questions about transparency and accountability surrounding one of the UK’s most contentious planning decisions.
A legal challenge has been brought by the Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association, which argues that the government’s decision to approve the embassy failed to properly address the key objections raised during the planning process. (Jurist)
UK court sentences two for spying on HK dissidents
A UK court on June 18 sentenced two men for gathering information illegally against Hong Kong pro-democracy activists who are now residing in the country. Justice Cheema-Grubb imposed prison terms of eight and ten years, respectively.
In her sentencing remarks, Cheema-Grubb reiterated that the activities of both Chi Leung Wai and Chung Biu Yuen—providing information on dissidents to Hong Kong authorities through access to the UK’s confidential database—amounted to “shadow policing operations.” She said their conduct was part of an attempt to return dissidents to China or Hong Kong via an extrajudicial process that harms the UK’s safety and autonomy. Cheema-Grubb especially described Wai’s surveillance activities as an “arrogant” disregard of rules and norms. She said Wai’s action as a public officer of the Border Force “corrodes confidence in the fairness and security of the country’s immigration system.”
Helen Flanagan, lead investigator of Counter Terrorism Policing London, said the sentences reflected the seriousness of the crime, and hoped the outcome would reassure UK residents that they can live in the country free from foreign threats.
On the other hand, a Hong Kong SAR government spokesperson told local Radio Television Hong Kong that the convictions were “false and smearing.” Both the Chinese and Hong Kong governments reiterated that they were not parties to these accusations.
By a 10-2 majority verdict, a criminal jury at the Central Criminal Court of England and Wales (the Old Bailey) found Chi Leung Wai and Chung Biu Yuen guilty of assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act 2023 (NSA) on May 7. The prosecution’s case is that Yuen, as the office manager of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London, tasked Wai with surveillance activities on Hong Kong dissidents. Wai took advantage of his position as a UK Border Force officer and researched the city’s pro-democracy activists based in the UK. Wai was further convicted of misfeasance in public office by obtaining the personal data of Hong Kong dissidents through the Home Office computer system. However, the jury found them not guilty of foreign interference.
Responding to May’s jury conviction, UK-based rights group Hong Kong Watch, together with the chairperson of the UK’s Joint Committee on Human Rights, Lord Alton of Liverpool, said the case is part of a “systematic, well-documented transnational repression.” China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Jian Lin said the criminal proceedings were a political ploy and an abuse of the law to support anti-China forces.
According to a 2025 parliamentary report, “transnational repression” occurs in the UK. However, it lacks a formal definition, hindering the creation of an effective policy response. The report also acknowledged that the existing NSA may be insufficient to address transnational repression for its evolving technological nature.
In the first independent review of the NSA, Johnathan Hall KC nevertheless cautioned that the act can put innocent interactions with foreign intelligence services within its scope, requiring additional vigilance in the use of the NSA provisions. (Jurist)