The US government announced Oct. 16 that it will settle a 2018 class-action lawsuit that challenged the Trump administration’s family separation practice at the US-Mexico border. The proposed settlement would create a process to reunify families who were separated. Additionally, the government is to provide health services and housing support for affected families, and arrange legal services through the Executive Office for Immigration Review. Attorney General Merrick Garland stated, “This agreement will facilitate the reunification of separated families and provide them with critical services to aid in their recovery.”
As another provision of the deal, the federal government would be barred from immigration policies that separate parents from children for eight years. The settlement does not provide any monetary relief for affected people. The parties filed a joint petition asking the US district court in Southern California to approve the settlement.
The case, Ms. L vs ICE, was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of an asylum-seeking mother and her seven-year-old daughter who were fleeing violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo—only to be forcibly torn from each other in the US and detained separately 2,000 miles apart. (Jurist, AP, ACLU)
Despite the overturn of the Trump-era family separation policy, thousands of minors remain detained by US immigration authorities.
Photo: BBC World Service via Flickr
Program helps unaccompanied minors reunite with their parents
The children of immigrants sometimes make the trip to the US-Mexico border alone to reunite with parents already in the US. There is an immigration program that allows some to send for their children legally and safely. But the Central American Minors (CAM) program that could go away if President Biden loses the 2024 election. (PRI)
US government moves to end Flores Settlement
The US government filed a motion on May 10 to partially end a 27-year-old agreement that requires the federal government to comply with court supervision about the treatment of migrant children in its custody. The government argued that the Flores SettlementAgreement has outlived its purpose and new regulations are a better solution to ensure the safety of children. (AP, Jurist)