Trump’s executive order purporting to establish a regulation regime for artificial intelligence actually serves the aim of a government partnership with the AI industry to advance the police state. Ironically, it is the AI company Anthropic that is calling for a moratorium on development of the technology until its threats are assessed. Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical, “Magnifica Humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence,” raises critical points but still echoes the illusion that this technology, now threatening to develop its own powers of “recursive self-improvement,” can be effectively regulated. There are encouraging signs of worker pushback against replacement by AI, and an emerging anarchist critique of the technology. Of course the Trump regime is targeting critics for repression as “anti-tech extremists.” In a commentary for the UK anarchist journal Freedom, Bill Weinberg calls for total abolition of AI, citing unacceptable threats to humanity on ecological, epistemological and eschatological grounds.

With a landmark filing to the Federal Communications Commission, SpaceX proposed a network of one million solar-powered satellites designed not for communication, but for computation. This “Orbital Data Center” system, bolstered by the recent SpaceX-xAI merger, aims to place massive AI server farms into outer space—opening a jurisdictional dilemma. We are witnessing the birth of “Digital Soil,” a new form of territory where power is exercised not by planting flags, but by controlling space-based data processing. For emerging economies and Global South democracies, the implications are severe. If orbital infrastructure becomes the backbone of global AI, exclusion from its governance will translate directly into a new form of digital dependency. In a commentary for JURIST website, Vishal Sharma of NALSAR University in Hyderabad argues that the United Nations must designate orbital strata as “International Data Commons” to ensure that the “Digital Soil” of our future remains a global public good.

Given the absence of congressional authorization, UN Security Council approval, or any credible showing of imminence, the Trump administration’s strikes on Iran constitute violations of both US constitutional law and foundational international norms, setting a dangerous precedent for unchecked executive war-making. Mohamed Arafa, professor of law at Egypt’s Alexandria University, makes the case in a commentary for JURIST.

The recent unveiling of Russia’s Selena project, a nuclear power plant slated for the lunar surface by 2035 under the joint Russo-Chinese International Lunar Research Station program, has been hailed as an unprecedented ambition of engineering. But beneath the proposed cooling towers lies a volatile reality. We are about to place the highest-stakes technologies of the 21st century—autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) and nuclear fission—on a legal foundation that has been frozen since the Cold War. In a commentary for JURIST website, Vishal Sharma of NALSAR University in Hyderabad argues that we need a new Lex Spacialis to fill the vacuum of space before it is filled by the strongest unaccountable power, with no human oversight.

Trouble-torn Burma is heading for the first general elections since the military coup of February 2021 that ousted a democratically elected government. The seating of a new parliament will mark the re-opening of the bicameral body which was suspended when the military junta seized power. However, several prominent political parties will be barred from the three-phase polling to start on December 28—including Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy, which won the last general elections held in November 2020. The new elections, with only parties approved by the military junta participating, are rejected by the opposition as a “sham.” And there will be no voting in the nearly half of the country now under the control of the armed resistance loyal to the rebel parallel government, CounterVortex correspondent Nava Thakuria speaks to opposition activists in clandestinity, who demand that the world reject the junta’s controlled elections.

Birthright citizenship in the United States was never a bureaucratic detail or an immigration loophole. It was a direct assault on white supremacy’s original theory of the nation—that Black presence was permissible only as labor, never as belonging. The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment sought to end that theory for good. That amendment did not just welcome formerly enslaved Black people into the civic body; it attempted to inoculate the Constitution itself against the return of caste. Yet white supremacy, in every generation, finds new ways to renegotiate the boundaries of who counts as fully American. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the consolidated case challenging lower-court rulings that struck down Trump’s attempt to repeal birthright citizenship. This signals that the highest court in the land is willing to consider whether whiteness may once again serve as the gatekeeper of America’s future. Timothy Benston of The Black Eye Substack writes that if this administration and this Court seek to restore whiteness as the measure of full belonging, they must face resistance equal to the enormity of that threat.

This week, President Donald Trump pardoned a man federal prosecutors described as the architect of a “narco-state” who moved 400 tons of cocaine to United States shores. In September, the US military began killing people on Caribbean vessels based on unproven suspicions they were doing the same thing on a far smaller scale. The strikes have drawn allegations of war crimes; the contradiction has drawn bipartisan scrutiny. In an explainer for JURIST, Ingrid Burke Friedman examines the White House legal justifications for the air-strikes, and the response from international law experts. She also dissects the politics behind the divergent approaches to the pardoned Honduran ex-president Juan Orlando Hernández and the incumbent Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro—who faces trafficking charges in the US, and a destabilization campaign.

The Chinese state’s hydro-electric activities on Tibet’s Yarlung Tsangpo River—known in India as the Brahmaputra—have long been a source of tension with the downstream countries of India and Bangladesh, which cite a risk of ecological disaster. Now Beijing has started building a colossal dam at the Tsangpo’s great bend in southeastern Tibet, close to the border with the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh. Chinese Premier Li Qiang just attended the groundbreaking ceremony for the Medog Hydropower Station in Nyingchi, Tibet Autonomous Region, and hailed it as the “project of the century.” But the $168 billion hydro-dam, which will be the world’s largest when it is completed, is described by Arunachal Pradesh leaders as an “existential threat.” CounterVortex correspondent Nava Thakuria reports from Northeast India.

The formal dissolution of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which had waged an armed insurgency against the Turkish state since 1984, has implications beyond the borders of Turkey, as the ideology of imprisoned leader Abdullah Öcalan has won a following among militant Kurds in Syria, Iraq, Iran and the greater diaspora. In an analysis for Britain’s anarchist-oriented Freedom News, writer Blade Runner argues that the PKK dissolution does not necessarily represent a retreat, but is the culmination of a long rethinking of the precepts of vanguardism, ethno-nationalism and separatism in favor of a broader strategic vision emphasizing gender liberation, pluralism and local democracy.

In an unprecedented wave of demonstrations across government-held territory, the Syrian people have taken to the streets not to challenge their own leadership, but to protest Israel’s ongoing human rights atrocities in Gaza and its repeated military strikes on Syrian soil. An explainer by JURIST breaks down what’s fueling the anger, what it signals about a country emerging from decades of harsh internal rule, and why Syrians are rallying around a cause that reaches well beyond their own country’s borders.

Native American activist Leonard Peltier, one of the longest-serving federal prisoners in US history, has been released to home confinement after spending nearly five decades behind bars. His imprisonment stems from a controversial 1977 conviction in the shooting deaths of two FBI agents on South Dakota’s Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, a case that has been harshly contested between activists and law enforcement for generations. As Peltier returns to his birthplace on North Dakota’s Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation, his case continues to raise questions about justice, reconciliation, and the relationship between the federal government and Native American nations. In an explainer for JURIST, Ingrid Burke Friedman looks back on his case and its legacy.

In a brief memoir written for Canada’s Skunk magazine, CounterVortex editor Bill Weinberg recalls his days as a young neo-Yippie in the 1980s. A remnant faction of the 1960s counterculture group adopted a punk aesthetic for the Reagan era, launched the US branch of the Rock Against Racism movement, brought chaos to the streets at Republican and Democratic political conventions, defied the police in open cannabis “smoke-ins” —and won a landmark Supreme Court ruling for free speech. The Yippie clubhouse at 9 Bleecker Street, the hub for all these activities, has long since succumbed to the gentrification of the East Village, but it survived long enough to provide inspiration to a new generation of radical youth during Occupy Wall Street.