Abu Ghraib photos depict rape, sexual assault: ex-US general

Photographs of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib prison that President Barack Obama does not want to release include depictions of rape and sexual assault, according to former Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba May 27. In an interview with the UK’s Daily Telegraph, Taguba supported Obama’s decision not to release the photos, maintaining that doing so would endanger US troops.

In April, the Department of Justice agreed to release at least 44 photographs of alleged detainee abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan pursuant to a court order. After lobbying from senior military officials and meeting with White house lawyers, Obama reversed the decision to release the photos based on concerns for the safety of US troops. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) criticized Obama’s decision, claiming that it contradicted the administration’s desire to restore transparency and moral standing. Taguba addressed the ramifications of releasing the photographs, saying:

I am not sure what purpose their release would serve other than a legal one and the consequence would be to imperil our troops, the only protectors of our foreign policy, when we most need them, and British troops who are trying to build security in Afghanistan. The mere description of these pictures is horrendous enough, take my word for it.

Taguba investigated the alleged abuse in 2004 and reported his findings, which include sworn statements by 13 detainees whom he called “credible based on the clarity of their statements and supporting evidence.” Taguba’s 2004 report, while lacking information regarding photographs of rape, alleges detainee abuse that includes sodomizing with objects, beatings, humiliation, taking sexually explicit photographs, and threats of rape.

After Obama’s recent decision to not release the photographs, the DoJ sent a letter to district Judge Alvin Hellerstein saying that “the Government has decided to pursue further options regarding that decision, including, but not limited to the option of seeking certiorari.” Last month, the DOJ sent a letter to Hellerstein saying that they would comply with his 2005 order to release 21 photos from Abu Ghraib. Hellerstein’s order resulted from a Freedom of Information Act challenge brought by the ACLU against the Department of Defense. The DoD appealed the decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and lost.

The Pentagon has denied that any of the photographs in question depict sexual abuse. (Jurist, May 28)

See our last posts on the torture scandal and the photo-video evidence.

  1. Crucifixion at Abu Ghraib?
    Jane Mayer writes for New Yorker, June 22:

    No criminal charges have ever been brought against any C.I.A. officer involved in the torture program, despite the fact that at least three prisoners interrogated by agency personnel died as the result of mistreatment. In the first case, an unnamed detainee under C.I.A. supervision in Afghanistan froze to death after having been chained, naked, to a concrete floor overnight. The body was buried in an unmarked grave. In the second case, an Iraqi prisoner named Manadel al-Jamadi died on November 4, 2003, while being interrogated by the C.I.A. at Abu Ghraib prison, outside Baghdad. A forensic examiner found that he had essentially been crucified; he died from asphyxiation after having been hung by his arms, in a hood, and suffering broken ribs. Military pathologists classified the case a homicide. A third prisoner died after an interrogation in which a C.I.A. officer participated, though the officer evidently did not cause the death. (Several other detainees have disappeared and remain unaccounted for, according to Human Rights Watch.)