9-11 conspiracists invade Ground Zero

Sarah Ferguson reports for the Village Voice Sept. 12 on how the conspiracy set crashed the official 9-11 commemoration:

The anguish was palpable at Ground Zero yesterday, as family members made their way down a long ramp into the vast emptiness of the World Trade Center site, then took turns reading out the names of their lost loved ones.

“We love you, Georgie. We’ll see you soon,” pledged the parents of a fallen firefighter, their sad voices broadcast to the crowds of grieving onlookers milling quietly around the perimeter.

Into this somber setting marched about a dozen 9-11 conspiracists, who claimed a patch of sidewalk to preach what they called the truth. “These people weren’t killed by Arab terrorists. You’ve been lied to!” shouted a woman who looked vaguely like Joey Ramone, holding up one end of a banner that read, “9-11 World Trade Center: Controlled Demolition.”

Her name was Lisa Giuliani and she broadcasts her theories though a Pennsylvania grassroots video collective called Wing TV.

She lectured about how only a series of controlled explosions could have so rapidly pancaked the twin towers. “There’s no way jet fuel could have melted all that steel. It was a freefall. The concrete was so thoroughly pulverized, Manhattan was blanketed in dust. Think about it,” she urged. “Do your homework, please!”

Her message played about as badly as could be expected. “I was there, so shut the fuck up. You don’t know what you’re talking about,” snapped an enraged firefighter in fatigues, stalking off into the crowd.

“You shouldn’t be here. Have some respect,” another firefighter shouted.

“It’s a crime scene,” Lisa Giuliani shot back. “We honor them with the truth. Al Qaeda is a concept. This is state-sponsored terrorism.”

The clamor was all too much for a passing tourist. “God bless America, you bitch!” he screamed in a thick accent.

“Go back to where you came from, you foreigner,” groused a fellow conspiracist.

“But I am French,” the tourist responded indignantly.

And so it went, a sad comedy of slurs that went on for most of the morning, drawing crowds of puzzled onlookers before the police would shoo them away to clear the sidewalk.

At one point, an auxiliary fireman stepped forward and tried to reason with the protesters to “respect the memorial sentiment.”

“Believe me, I have questions too,” he told the protesters. “But you’ve got to respect the dead. These people are not ready for this. You’re just creating resentment.”

The demolition lady was adamant. “There is no good time. I lost a lot of firefighter friends too,” she maintained, adding, “This is the only way we can reach the 9-11 families.”

It seemed most family members did their best to ignore the speakout. “That’s what this country is about, that people can say what they want even if I don’t agree with it,” said Rudy Dimmling of Westbury, Long Island, whose brother William died in the North Tower, leaving behind a wife and two kids. “To have more fingerpointing and Congressional hearings, where does that get us? I can’t live with myself to think that that was a conspiracy,” he said, clearly pained at the thought of even having to address such a question.

One might have thought the Bush administration’s bungled response to the Katrina catastrophe could put a crimp in conspiracists’ efforts to prove that the 9-11 was much more than just a colossal “failure of the imagination,” as the 9-11 commission claimed. After seeing firsthand how President Bush and FEMA ignored years of warnings about the threat of a hurricane on the Gulf Coast, then dawdled while people drowned, maybe it’s not so hard to fathom how our vacationing president could have blown off repeated intelligence warnings about the growing threat of al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden in the summer of 2001.

Yet it seems Katrina is now just more fuel for the conspiracy pyre, with the Internet buzzing with theories of how the feds blew up the levees to flood poor areas of New Orleans and preserve the ritzy French Quarter.

Down at Ground Zero, the 9-11 “truth” warriors were clearly emboldened by the hurricane fiasco. “The public saw people dying while Condi was shopping for shoes, Dick Cheney was playing fake cowboy, and Bush was backstage playing guitar,” relished Ben Maurier of Brooklyn, who predicted a wash of new converts to the cause. “If they knowingly allowed that many people to die in New Orleans, why should it be a stretch that the government did 9-11?”

Had they gotten off their soap boxes, the conspiracists might have found more empathy among survivors like Kevin Lester, who worked on the 102nd floor of the North Tower, and who lost his brother and numerous coworkers there. “I sometimes wonder if there could have been a conspiracy,” confessed Lester, who said he survived on 9-11 only because he popped downstairs to get his shoes shined just before the first plane hit. “Some of the arguments kind of make sense, like the slow response rate [to the hijacked planes], or how Bush reacted that day. I saw Fahrenheit 911. It makes you wonder.

“But still, I just kind of deplore heavy-duty political rhetoric at a memorial. Why today? Why?” he demanded. “Right now I’m still dealing with survivor’s guilt. How about giving us a hug rather than stamping in our face?”

Not all the 9-11 skeptics were so brazen. Distinguishing themselves from the proselytizers downtown, about 200 protesters gathered outside the offices of the New York Times shouting, “Tell the truth!” The protest was organized by members of NY911truth.org to condemn the failure of the mainstream press. They say the media failed to raise questions about the numerous unexplained anomalies of 9-11-like why it took NORAD so long to scramble planes when five war games were running that day, or why World Trade Center owner Ken Silverstein implied that that WTC building 7 was “pulled”—a reported comment which leads conspiracists to presume that the other towers could have been intentionally taken down, too.

“Why isn’t the media asking these questions?” demanded retired Lieutenant Colonel Robert Bowman, who has become one of the celebrity skeptics because of his credentials as a former interceptor pilot who helped direct the Star Wars program under Carter and Ford. “Where are the tapes of the Pentagon hit? Where are the tapes of the conversations between NORAD and the air traffic controllers? Why are they hiding them? If our government had done nothing and just let normal procedures happen, those planes would have been intercepted and thousands of people would still be alive. It’s treason,” he insisted. “Bush and Cheney should be impeached.”

But the Grey Lady didn’t even blink, with not so much as a reporter poking a head out of one of the windows.

Many in the crowd seemed shocked that more New Yorkers had not joined them. They pointed to a Zogby poll taken last summer that showed half of all New Yorkers believe the U.S. leaders had “foreknowledge” of the attacks and “consciously” failed to act.

But that word “consciously” is slippery, and could just as well refer to what people can now read in the media: that Bush, the NSA, CIA and FBI on down had information that a big attack on America was about to happen.

Undaunted, the protesters marched through the canyons of Midtown, shoveling leaflets at bewildered shoppers as they chanted things like “Figure it out. It’s not hard. Nine-11 was an inside job!” and even “Remember New Orleans!”—as if anyone could forget. They passed by the headquarters of FOX, NBC, Time Warner, and CNN, pausing to shout at the media for ignoring them as a few police officers looked on.

See our last posts on the ongoing 9-11 investigations, the 9-11 propaganda war, and the political struggle over Ground Zero.

  1. Skeptical of the skeptics
    We question the credentials of this Robert Bowman character. How could he have worked on “Star Wars” under Ford and Carter when the program wasn’t launched until Reagan? Also, his website indicates he is a follower of the so-called United Catholic Church, part of the generally reactionary “Traditionalist” schism. This doesn’t necessarily delegitimize what he has to say about 9-11, but it is potentially a little creepy, at least. Yes, many Traditionalists are merely nostalgic for the Latin mass, but the movement has also served as a rallying point for neo-fascists of the clerical variety, as have noted. And speaking of wingnuts, did you happen to notice the book being sold at the conspiranoid demo entitled 9-11, the Great Illusion: Endgame of the Illuminati? And these guys demand the New York Times take them seriously?

    And who writes their slogans? “Figure it out, It’s not hard, Nine-11 was an inside job”? Since when does “hard” rhyme with “job”?

    1. psy – ops
      I suspect that there are a few professionals in the ranks of conspiricists to help muddy the water. It’s harder to talk to a fireman about about Haliburton overcharges after ‘Endgame of the Illumanti’.