In a brief Associated Press account of the sentencing of supposed ELF operative Briana Waters, the New York Times June 20 uncritically uses the loaded term “ecoterrorist” in the headline. If you actually read the blurb, it turns out she is accused of serving as a look-out in an arson attack on a research center at the University of Washington Botanic Gardens. Nobody was killed, nobody was injured. Was this an act of “terrorism”?
Washington: Ecoterrorist Sentenced to Six Years
A California woman convicted in an ecoterrorism attack at the University of Washington has been sentenced to six years in prison and to pay $6 million in restitution. A Seattle television station, KIRO, reported that the woman, Briana Waters of Berkeley, had asked for mercy because she has a 3-year-old daughter. Prosecutors had recommended a 10-year sentence. Ms. Waters, 32, was sentenced in Federal District Court in Tacoma after being convicted of arson on March 6. She was a student at Evergreen State College in 2001 when she acted as a lookout as others set fire to the Center for Urban Horticulture. The Earth Liberation Front, a loosely organized radical environmental group that has been linked to acts of ecoterrorism in the Northwest, claimed responsibility because it believed, mistakenly, that a researcher was genetically modifying poplar trees. The blaze, which destroyed the plant research center, was one of at least 17 fires set from 1996 to 2001 by the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front. In all, more than a dozen people were arrested; four suspects remain at large.
In a story on the case in Salon March 27, “Is Briana Waters a Terrorist?”, writer Tracy Tullis quotes Lauren Regan, director of the Civil Liberties Defense Center in Eugene, OR: “There’s a question of whether burning property is really the equivalent of flying a plane into a building and killing humans.”
Well yes, that’s a question—but is it the question? 9-11, after all, is a pretty tough act to follow. On one hand, federal prosecutors are still milking outrage at 9-11 to paint with the broad brush of “terrorism” any act of physical sabotage or property damage in advance of a political cause. On the other hand, while arson may not be exactly terrorism, it isn’t exactly not terrorism either. It is in a gray area where the lines can be blurred. After all, there are plenty of things which we would all agree constitute terrorism (just check the daily headlines from Yemen, Algeria, the Philippines, Spain, India, Sri Lanka, etc.) that fall significantly short of “flying a plane into a building and killing [thousands of] humans.”
So there is a degree of disingenuousness on both sides of this particular rhetorical debate. Briana’s own support website, SupportBrianna.org, to its credit, avoids the whole rhetorical issue and uses the less loaded and more precise term “arson.” It also emphasizes:
Briana steadfastly maintains her innocence. She is a peaceful woman who believes in non-violence. In 2001, she directed a documentary, entitled Watch, which tells the moving true story of a peaceful campaign that built a coalition between environmentalists, loggers, and the residents of Randle, Washington to save the old-growth forest on Watch Mountain.
Briana’s family, friends, and supporters were heartbroken and left in disbelief when a federal jury found her guilty of two counts of arson on March 6, 2008. She is currently detained while awaiting sentencing. She faces a mandatory five-year minimum prison term, potentially subject to an enhancement of up to twenty years.
See our last post on the green scare.
Fugitive “eco-terrorist” busted for cannabis in China
From AP, Nov 28:
Did they call themselves “the Family,” or is that what the FBI dubbed them? If the former, they need a new PR guy.
Huh? Why would someone concerned with the environment be using toxic chemicals (presumably isopropyl alcohol) to process cannabis?
Briana Waters’ conviction overturned
From the San Francisco Chronicle, Sept. 16:
Most-wanted “eco-terrorist” surrenders
From Reuters, Nov. 28:
SPLC on “eco-terrorist” bandwagon
A report on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch blog (“Keeping an Eye on the Radical Right”) has an update about Jeanette Rubin’s surrender, playing up the creep “Family” moniker and noting that the charges against her were the fruit of a major federal investigation, “Operation Backfire.” One reader named Susan commented:
Really, SPLC. Whatever else the ELF may be, are they part of the “radical right”?
Eco-militant Joseph Dibee to be freed
Joseph Dibee was sentenced on Nov. 1 in federal court in Eugene to time served and could be also ordered to pay a portion of the $1.3 million in restitution other defendants in the case have previously been ordered to pay. In April, Dibee pleaded guilty to the 1997 arson of Cavel West, a slaughterhouse in central Oregon. He also pleaded guilty to the 2001 arson of a Bureau of Land Management wild horse corral in Litchfield, Calif. As part of his plea agreement, federal prosecutors dropped arson charges Dibee also faced in Washington state
US District Judge Ann Aiken also included in Dibee’s sentence 1,000 hours of community service and supervised release. Aiken has overseen the decades-long case that has included more than 13 defendants. (OPB)