Pentagon admits Koran desecration

Well, after all the “Newsweek-lied-people-died” gloating, the Pentagon acknowledges Koran abuse at Gitmo (while denying the toilet incident).

Pentagon Admits Five Acts of ‘Mishandling’ the Koran
By Rupert Cornwell
The Independent UK

Friday 27 May 2005

The Pentagon admitted last night it had substantiated five occasions when US military personnel at Guantánamo Bay prison “mishandled” the Koran of Muslim detainees. But it said it found no credible evidence to confirm a complaint that the Islamic holy book had been flushed down a toilet.

Jay W Hood, the one-star general who commands the detention centre for suspected terrorists on Cuba, refused to give details of the cases of mishandling, saying the incidents, which occurred early in the camp’s existence, were still under investigation. That they could be “broadly defined” as mishandling was as far as he would go.

But he told a press conference that a prisoner who reportedly complained to an FBI agent that a military guard had thrown a Koran into a toilet told Brig-Gen Hood’s team that he had only been told of the incident, and had never witnessed any form of desecration at first hand.

The admission by the military is the latest twist in an affair which began with a claim in the 9 May issue of Newsweek magazine that a Pentagon internal report had concluded that a Koran had been flushed in a toilet, as alleged by several detainees after their release from Guantánamo Bay.

The report contributed to riots in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and was then challenged by the Bush administration. After checking with the unnamed official who gave the tip, the magazine acknowledged the report was mistaken. It formally retracted the story in much embarrassment, but not before more damage had been inflicted on the tattered reputation of the US across the Islamic world.

However, controversy flared again with the publication of FBI documents on Wednesday, recording further allegations from detainees that the Koran had been desecrated. Last night’s appearance by Brig-Gen Hood was in response to these documents, unearthed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which campaigns against prison abuse.

“I’d like you to know that we have found no credible evidence that a member of the Joint Task Force at Guantánamo Bay ever flushed a Koran down a toilet,” Brig-Gen Hood said. But 13 incidents of alleged mishandling of the Koran had been identified. Of the alleged incidents, five were substantiated, he said.

Nonetheless, his account is likely only to fuel controversy over the base, described this week by Amnesty International as a “Gulag”. It may also partly restore the reputation of Newsweek, after its scolding by the White House and Pentagon. It increasingly seems the magazine, while slipping up over an important detail, was correct in the broad picture it presented of Guantánamo Bay.###

See our last post on this horrific affair.

  1. Yet more grim vindication
    This account from the LA Times sheds more light on Koran desecration at Gitmo. The Pentagon still won’t concede the toilet incident, but admits a guard urinated on a Koran (accidentally, we are told). Especially troubling are accounts of intentional Koran desecration by the prisoners themselves, perhaps pointing to psychological warfare operations…

    Pentagon: Koran Defiled
    By Richard A. Serrano
    The Los Angeles Times

    Saturday 04 June 2005

    An Army commander’s report details five instances of the holy book being desecrated at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

    Washington – The Pentagon late Friday confirmed five incidents of Koran desecration at the prison for detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, wrapping up a high-priority investigation.

    The findings concluded that one soldier deliberately kicked the Muslim holy book, other guards hit it with water balloons, and a soldier’s urine splashed on a prisoner and his Koran.

    Details of the incidents are contained in the final report of the inquiry headed by Army Brig. Gen. Jay Hood, commander of the detention center for terrorism suspects at the U.S. naval base in Cuba.

    The report established that two other cases of desecration had occurred. In one, a two-word obscenity was written in English inside a prisoner’s Koran. In the other, an interrogator deliberately stepped on the book. That interrogator was later fired for “a pattern of unacceptable behavior.”

    Charges of Koran desecration triggered vociferous protests in the Muslim world and were blamed for contributing to riots in Pakistan and Afghanistan that resulted in more than two dozen deaths. But Hood, in releasing his final report, said his investigators found no proof that U.S. personnel flushed a Koran down a toilet at Guantanamo Bay, an assertion reported but later retracted by Newsweek magazine.

    “The inquiry found no credible evidence that a member of the Joint Task Force at Guantanamo Bay ever flushed a Koran down a toilet,” Hood said. “This matter is considered closed.”

    Lawrence Di Rita, a spokesman for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, said that military policy called for “respectful and appropriate” handling of the Koran. “The Hood inquiry would appear to confirm that policy,” said Di Rita, who was traveling with Rumsfeld in Asia.

    Hood said the five confirmed incidents represented a very small number when measured against the fact that more than 1,600 copies of the holy book had been distributed to prisoners since the facility in Cuba was opened in January 2002.

    And the general said his team gathered evidence that detainees themselves desecrated the Koran on 15 separate occasions. Two of them tossed their copies into toilets while another was seen “urinating on the Koran,” the report said. Hood said that guards also spotted detainees using the Koran as a pillow and ripping out its pages.

    “Mishandling a Koran at Guantanamo Bay is a rare occurrence,” he said, noting that guards, interrogators, interpreters and other military personnel were trained to handle the holy book in specified ways. Gloves must be worn and both hands are to be used in a “manner signaling respect and reverence,” the report noted.

    At least some of the special handling rules were instituted after a rash of detainee complaints of mistreatment of the Koran in 2002 that led to a series of hunger strikes. After the rules were put in place, the International Red Cross reported that it received no further complaints.

    “Mishandling of a Koran here is never condoned,” Hood said. “When one considers the many thousands of times detainees have been moved and cells have been searched … I think one can only conclude that respect for detainee religious beliefs was embedded in the culture of the [Joint Task Force] from the start.”

    Hood said his investigation took three weeks and involved the review of more than 30,000 documents. “We reviewed every available detainee record,” the general said.

    In Washington, Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim advocacy group, issued a statement saying, “President Bush must address the climate of abuse that seems to prevail at U.S. detention centers worldwide.” Awad said it was not enough to merely issue reports outlining abuse or to punish low-level personnel.

    “Those at the top must be held responsible for the actions of the men and women they command,” he said.

    Hood’s report described the five confirmed desecrations.

    During an interrogation in February 2002, a detainee complained that guards had kicked the Koran belonging to a prisoner in a nearby cell four or five days earlier. The interrogator reported the complaint in a written memorandum and confirmed that the guards were aware of the allegation.

    “There is no evidence of further investigation concerning this incident,” the report said. “However, we consider this a confirmed report.”

    The second incident occurred on July 25, 2003, when a contract interrogator apologized to a prisoner for stepping on his Koran. The prisoner accepted the apology, and told other detainees “to cease disruptive behavior caused by the incident.”

    The report added that “the interrogator was later terminated for a pattern of unacceptable behavior, an inability to follow direct guidance and poor leadership.”

    The third episode took place Aug. 15, 2003, when two detainees complained “that their Korans were wet because the night shift guards had thrown water balloons on the [cell] block.” Guards on a swing shift passed the complaints on to superiors.

    “We have not determined if the detainees made further complaints or if the Korans were replaced,” the report said.

    “There is no evidence that this incident was investigated. There is no evidence that the incident, although clearly inappropriate, caused any type of disturbance on the block.” Nevertheless, “we consider this a confirmed incident.”

    Six days later a detainee complained to a guard that a two-word obscenity had been written in English on the inside cover of his English-version Koran.

    “We have found no evidence to confirm who wrote in the detainee’s Koran,” the report said. “The detainee speaks English at a conversational level. It is possible that a guard committed this act; it is equally possible that the detainee wrote in his own Koran. However, we consider this a confirmed incident.”

    The final episode happened on March 25 of this year. A detainee complained that urine came through an air vent and splashed him and his holy book as he lay near the vent.

    “A guard reported that he was at fault,” the report said. “The guard had left his observation area post and went outside to urinate. He urinated near an air vent and the wind blew his urine through the vent into the block.

    “The sergeant of the guard responded and immediately relieved the guard. The sergeant of the guard ensured the detainee received a fresh uniform and a new Koran.”

    The guard was reprimanded and assigned to gate duty, “where he had no contact with detainees for the remainder of his assignment” at the prison.

    “There is no record that this incident caused any type of disturbance in the block,” the report said. “We consider this a confirmed incident.”

    In the 15 documented cases where detainees mishandled Korans, the report said, one occurred May 11, 2003, when a guard “observed a detainee rip up his Koran and state he was no longer a Muslim.”

    On June 5, 2003, a guard heard two detainees accuse a third prisoner of not being a man and saw the prisoner then “urinate on one of their Korans” in an adjacent cell.

    And on Feb. 23, 2004, a guard saw a detainee place two Korans in his toilet and “state he no longer cared abut the Koran or his religion.”

    “Five minutes later,” the report said, “after the detainee retrieved the Korans, he ripped several pages out of one Koran and threw the pages on the floor. Then he placed both Korans on the sink.”

    On Jan. 19 of this year, the Hood report said, another detainee tore up his Koran and “tried to flush it down the toilet.”