Fighters loyal to ISIS have seized substantial territory in Afghanistan, according to an ominous Reuters report June 29. Witnesses who fled fighting in Nangarhar province told reporters that hundreds of ISIS fighters in convoys of pick-up trucks mounted with machine guns seized several villages that were held by the Taliban—and put local opium fields to the torch. "They burned poppy fields in Shadal village and banned shops from selling cigarettes," said tribal elder Malek Jan. Taxing opium production is a key source of Taliban revenue, but Reuters reports that ISIS loyalists in Nangarhar appeared to have other sources of money. Witnesses said they had plenty of cash. It is unclear where the money is coming from, but it frees ISIS to stigmatize the Taliban as soft on drugs.
The Taliban are talking tough against these upstarts. "They are thieves and thugs … We will soon clear those areas and free the villagers," said Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid. But Jan said some villagers welcomed ISIS. "Unlike the Taliban, they [ISIS] don't force villagers to feed and house them. Instead, they have lots of cash in their pockets and spend it on food and luring young villagers to join them." Again, not thusly burdening the villagers seems to be an indulgence afforded ISIS by someone's largesse. We'd sure like to know whose. Are oil revenues from the ISIS heartland in Syria funding these guys?
The US has apparently taken note of the growing ISIS presence. Reuters reported June 28 that the US carried out air-strikes on unnamed "militants" in Nuristan and Paktika provinces. Paktika was named as a stronghold of the Taliban-aligned Haqqani network. But the report also noted that "support for ISIS…has spread and the group is expanding its contingent of foreign fighters and disenchanted Taliban militants."
Cross-post to High Times and Global Ganja Report
Talks with the Taliban: bad idea
No coincidence that the opening of a formidable ISIS franchise in Afghanistan comes just as formal peace talks have opened with the Taliban in Kabul. This is a lose-lose, no matter how you look at it. It will strengthen ISIS by further entrenching the perception that the Taliban are now soft and coopted, and any concessions to the "moderate" (sic!) Taliban will be a grave betrayal of Afghanistan's women and ethnic minorities—as we have long argued. Fortunately the Wall Street Journal reports that the talks are going nowhere.
Split in Taliban leadership?
The Afghan Taliban released a video which they say shows followers pledging allegiance to new leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour. The footage is seen as an effort to bolster support for Mullah Mansour, whose appointment has been questioned by some senior Taliban members. It comes as the family of former head Mullah Omar say they have not endorsed Mullah Mansour as new leader. He was named leader this week after Mullah Omar's death was confirmed. In the audio message, Mullah Mansour dismissed peace talks as "propaganda campaigns by the enemy." (BBC News, AUg. 3)