CounterVortex

An interesting juxtaposition of news clips concerning lefty icon Julian Assange. First, from the New York Times, March 1:

Assange Complains of Jewish Smear Campaign
A report published by a British magazine on Tuesday said the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, suggested that British journalists, including the editor of The Guardian, were engaged in a Jewish-led conspiracy to smear his organization.

His remarks appeared in the magazine Private Eye, in an article by its editor, Ian Hislop, who outlined a rambling phone call that Mr. Assange made on Feb. 16 to complain about the coverage of WikiLeaks.

He was especially angry about a Private Eye report that Israel Shamir, an Assange associate in Russia, was a Holocaust denier. Mr. Assange complained that the article was part of a campaign by Jewish reporters in London to smear WikiLeaks.

A lawyer for Mr. Assange could not immediately be reached for comment, but in a statement later released on the WikiLeaks Twitter feed, Mr. Assange said Mr. Hislop had “distorted, invented or misremembered almost every significant claim and phrase.”

The Private Eye article quoted Mr. Assange as saying the conspiracy was led by The Guardian and included the newspaper’s editor, Alan Rusbridger, and investigations editor, David Leigh, as well as John Kampfner, a prominent London journalist who recently reviewed two books about WikiLeaks for The Sunday Times of London.

When Mr. Hislop pointed out that Mr. Rusbridger was not Jewish, Mr. Assange countered that The Guardian’s editor was “sort of Jewish” because he and Mr. Leigh, who is Jewish, were brothers-in-law. Later, the article recounted, Mr. Assange asked Mr. Hislop to “forget the Jewish thing,” but he continued to insist there was a conspiracy against WikiLeaks based on the friendship among Mr. Rusbridger, Mr. Leigh and Mr. Kampfner.

In the Twitter feed, Mr. Assange said that “in particular” the Private Eye report that he believed in a “‘Jewish conspiracy’ is false, in spirit and in word. It is serious and upsetting. Rather than correct a smear, Mr. Hislop has tried to justify one smear with another.”

“That he has a reputation for this, and is famed to have received more libel suits in the U.K. than any other journalist as a result, does not mean that it is right,” Mr. Assange’s statement said. “WikiLeaks promotes the ideal of ‘scientific journalism’—where the underlying evidence of all articles is available to the reader precisely in order to avoid these type of distortions. We treasure our strong Jewish support and staff, just as we treasure the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share our hope for a just world.”

After Mr. Assange was accused of sexual abuse by two women in Stockholm last summer, he cited a “smear campaign” against WikiLeaks. A London court ruled last week that he must be extradited to Sweden to face questioning on those accusations.

We couldn’t find the original story on the Private Eye website, and we do note that the Times headline is slightly dishonest since Assange denies the statements. But it is long overdue that Assange’s connection to the vile Israel Shamir got some media attention. And whether or not Assange really made his anti-Semitic tirade, his response on the Shamir question is utterly disingenuous. Glibly stating that Shamir isn’t a Holocaust denier dodges the point. Shamir may manage to stay out of the outright-denial camp through the most narrow and slippery use of (if you will) deniability. But does his website avidly promote Holocaust deniers? Yes, it does. (Also dig such non-ironic headlines as “Down With Human Rights” and “In Defense of Prejudice“—this in response to ADL protests of Shamir’s references to war-mongering “Jewish media-lords.”)

Shamir is also accused of collaborating (specifically, passing on WikiLeaks intelligence on anti-regime dissidents) with the virulently anti-Semitic Alexander Lukashenko dictatorship in Belarus. Assange owes us a full accounting of the nature of his association with the ultra-icky Shamir.

Which brings us to the next news clip. Middle East Online informs us March 2 that WikiLeaks has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. Happily, there will be stiff competition, as several courageous protest leaders in the Arab world have also been nominated. But now is the time for the world media (which have been fixated monomaniacally on the Assange sex scandal) to rise to the occasion and nail the WikiLeaks mastermind to the wall on the Shamir-Belarus connection. Because if WikiLeaks really did pass intelligence on to Lukashenko’s torture state, this could be the most ironic Nobel Peace Prize since Henry Kissinger. (Or at least Barack Obama.)

See our last posts on the WikiLeaks scandals and the politics of anti-Semitism.

Please leave a tip or answer the Exit Poll.